ROME facts
version 1.40 –Autodifesa / Self Defense
“At Rome’s
courthouse our legal paper disappeared and all was covered up…”
|
|
Roots.The igniter Since 2000,
it began an incredible persecution that interests totally both our job
and our private life. The enemy began to work in secret. The igniter was an
action carried out by an industrialist male. In the early period the
businessman tried to destroy the company where we were employed, pushing it
into unsafe affairs. First he tied company into a dangerous double business
relationship, becoming both supplier and customer. Later he blocked
his supplying freezing the natural and right activity of our company; at the
same time he forced our company, in order to cause a bankruptcy, into
apparent good affairs with his clients and “friends”. When the businessman’s
plot became clear it was too late,
our company had already lost everything , the lack of resources prevented to
our company to defense itself. On 2004 the businessman’s action came into
light: it was to enter into possession of patents and projects owned by our
company and to move technicians into his structure. As consequence our company was destroyed and
we remained unemployed. The businessman did not stop his action: he wanted us
into his company! Behind his façade he was arrogant, bad and violent. When we
tried to escape from his clutches, he just preferred turn into a destroying action rather than
left us free and he became to persecute us with all possible means: threats,
violence, intimidations, also using his money in taking legal actions against
us, and using his friendship into Italian authorities. He also began to
spread defamation all wide preventing not only we would find another job, but
also preventing no one authority would have aided us. He was the igniter. The defense On 2004 we decided for the first time to report to the Rome Court the case, and we
began to write some reports describing not only the businessman’s actions,
but also dirty affairs that involved birthplace environment. Since we hadn’t
the capability to react against the businessman’s power, in the reason both
of our new poor condition and of the enormous difference of power, therefore
first reports were submitted with the aim to ask aid, rather than to charge
someone with accusations. Our reaction, instead to move justice, caused to
happen other serious facts: like petrol into fire. We continued to report new
facts, and into following reports there were reported offences recognized by
Italian criminal code and the businessman’s actions.
Reports – “Esposti /
denunce” We sent first report —“esposti e denunce”
into Italian language— to Rome Court
on November 2004, a second report on December, a third report on February, a
fourth and a fifth report on March.
The reports were a mixture of new facts and an upgrading of the previous ones
(the receipt of the reports are contained apart into the “R1R7_spr”
part/file. [Click here]) [Remark: the Italian law establishes that reports
as soon as they come into court offices they are registered. If reports
contain crimes, then they are recorded into a particular logbook called
“Registro delle notizie di reato”. After, reports are read by a prosecutor:
he opens a proceeding and investigates about.] At Court On April 2005 we entered into offices at
Court in order to know the name of assigned prosecutor, but instead to obtain
the name, we discovered that our reports, except the first, didn’t reach the
Court! It was just incredible, our reports didn’t reach the Court! The
officer specified that each report should be recorded within two weeks,
therefore there should have been into database all the reports reached before
April. Officer inquired database deeply and
found only the first report of November, and found absolutely no
traces about other reports! As soon as we obtained such bad information, we
submitted a copy of missing papers directly to the office at Court —the
previous one have been sent by registered letter—. The submitted copy was
divided in two issues, recorded with two different serial number, as you can
see on proof R1R7_spr [Click here]. Two weeks later, on May we sent, by
registered letter, another report. On it we provided the list of missing
report deducing they were intercepted, stolen or lost. But this time we wrote
name and address of a lawyer, instead of our name. In the meantime, due to the numerous facts
and lacking any police protection, we had to protect by ourselves from
enemy’s actions: we had to escape from home. It began a period in which we
lived in extremely poor condition and during that time we had no
possibilities to go at Court again. We remained totally in the dark about
what happened later at Court. Court broke the silence On November 2005, the Court broke the silence
and sent us a fax (see apart the “2005NovemberProsecutorFax_spr” file [Click here]).
On the occasion a prosecutor wrote us that the report of May had been reached
by the Court, and it didn’t disappear like the previous ones! By fax we
learnt he had opened a proceedings charging unknown persons with the crime
616. The prosecutor in his fax confirmed our reports have been stolen or
lost, we believed he would have
permitted us to put on his hands directly all the missing reports preventing
further losses. In that way, the previous documents, which didn’t reached the
court, could have been analyzed as soon as possible. At that time, even if we
lived away, we still had home, we believed we would be returned soon at home
protected by police forces. Unfortunately prosecutor’s actions were not
on the direction we hoped, in fact he wanted to stop any investigation about, and the fax,
which he sent us contained just the request submitted to judge to close the proceeding. [Into Italian law a prosecutor can’t stop a
proceeding by himself, but through the
judge of preliminary investigation (GIP Giudice Indagini Preliminari) ]. The fax
was just notified to us in
order we could make legal opposition.
The reason explained by prosecutor was that
«there were no new elements to continue investigation in order to find if there was a theft or a loss».
In few the prosecutor wanted to close investigations even if the case still
remained unsolved and he did nothing in order to enter in possession of
previous disappeared papers! We made opposition sending both a fax
directly to his personal fax number, and a registered letter delivering it
directly to him. The appeal was not considered valid, because fax or
registered letters were no valid means, for Italian law: for a valid
opposition you must go to Court personally. In truth we had no other
possibilities because we had no money to operate in different manner and no
lawyer. We informed prosecutor about our poor condition but he did nothing to
resolve the problem. We sent other communications to prosecutor, but he never
replied.
Incredible mistakes On January 2006, it happened the judge closed the proceeding and we
remained completely in the dark about the verdict, until the end of March,
when we reached the Court. At that time we discovered that proceeding had
already been closed. The verdict is contained into
“2006JanuaryJudgeDecree_spr” file [Click here]. In the verdict we discovered serious
errors and we asked elucidations
about. On the occasion, we sent a fax at the end of March 2006: the
prosecutor replied a few days after. Our fax and prosecutor’s answer are contained
into “2006AprilProsecutorFax_spr”
file [Click
here]. The fatal errors contained into verdict were
caused by basic wrong data: wrong data on input = wrong data on output. The
decree declares that no crime had taken on June 2005, therefore it says that
the crime, we reported, was without foundation: in practice there were
neither loss nor thefts! Our report, which originated the proceeding,
was sent on May 2005, and on it was listed crimes committed before May! It
was not possible to write into a report of May a crime committed about one
month later, on June! This date of June is a terrible and evident mistake. This only means that decree has been created
on wrong basis, or manipulated data since we never wrote such data. Another important verdict error was that our
report of May listed more than one crime and more than one date! Instead the
verdict reports only an unique impossible crime date. Verdict errors became clear controlling other
proofs we furnished, in particular: the delivery receipts, which give
evidences of our reports sent between December 2004 and May 2005; the prosecutor’s November fax, into which
prosecutor wrote that our previous reports were missing, and prosecutor’s April fax, which confirm
again the disappearing. Another indirect proof was that no proceeding
was open concerning the crimes contained into the missing papers! The consequences devastating our life, as we
tell below. The following epochWith the April prosecutor’s fax
came into end a period of our life. Into following years we tried every way possible to set the record
straight, but the only thing we found was defamation and persecution! The disappearing of reports, the
several errors, the stopping of investigation, no one meeting fixed by Court
in order to debate about our report, our request of interview refused … were
many things that moved all into one direction: the missing interest into our
case and its consequently memory
lack. The enemy used the lacking of
interest to fulfill its plan: obviously it was convenient to remove any
evidences about what had happened, and, as we represented a living proof, the removing of us was, of course, the
natural part of the plan. To remove us and to make us inoffensive were used
all means just until our total destruction. Above all it was used defamation. A direct consequence was
our isolation from anyone who could aid us in any manner. The violence carried out by the
enemy and how it undisputed proliferate into Italian territory was stunning!
The phenomena involved authorities like mayors, members of police forces,
members of Church… Most of them was moved into the enemy’s plan like stupid
cogs. To move them against us enemy used tall stories and defamation, as we
explain better apart. On purpose, enemy told we were bandits,
criminals, lazy, good-for-nothing, gypsies, pushers... For example, a police superintendent was
pushed against us telling him we were people using illegal drugs. To him was
told nothing about what has really happened. In another case, preventing an
organization aided us, the enemy told we had numerous possession and we were
escaped from birthplace because a quarrel. One time we were described as
“entrepreneurs who were escaped with all company money”, another time as
“lazy people who moved around Italy with the Church’s money”, another time as
“criminals who hides themselves from police forces”, another time as “drugs
pushers”… It was used all means and all stories to block
us and to block any savior’s action. Prosecutors and police not only
left in 2006 the case unsolved, but also they left us without protection.
Between 2005 and 2010 we had to move into many different towns in order to
protect ourselves, but defamation pursued us everywhere, creating isolation. Of course, not all police forces
were involved and spread defamation, someone aided us, but they didn’t have
success in stopping the phenomenon and its origin. ConsequencesThe 2006 January verdict stopped every investigation
and the verdict errors stated unfortunately a false truth. The false truth
asserted that our reports were not stolen or lost. This thing had a lot of
consequences. Our reports, sent between December
2004 and April 2005, never reached the Court, therefore the contained crimes
were not analyzed and not prosecuted! Since reports contained our defense and it
was just impossible to submit reports in whatever way, this had the
consequence we had no possibility to defense ourselves! We remind that national and international law
stated that the right of defense is an inviolable right. What’s happened in
Italy should embarrass the world community! In addition, after the 2006
January verdict, it was formally just impossible to us to SUBMIT another copy
of such reports JUSTIFYING THEY have been STOLEN, because the verdict
declares that theft had not taken place! The way to submit newly the report
as new ones was also just impossible because the some crimes expired their
time to be denounced within, and because the general condition were changed. When we discovered on March 2006
that the proceeding was just closed, as ruled we had to appeal within two
months against the verdict at the Supreme Court “Corte di Cassazione”,
but at that time we were in extremely poor condition. More than a person,
convinced through defamation that we were telling tall stories, indirectly
blocked us preventing an appeal to Supreme Court. We made known these
aspects also to police forces, but
they did nothing about. The immediately
verdict consequence was that a false truth was broadcasted into the machine
of justice: no one took actions to repair the damage. The false truth
stated that no report were disappeared and for police forces, for local
authorities, for mayors, for journalists… we were only two person who were
telling to world an incredible
quantity of tall stories. Briefly we remained unprotected. Justice left on our own shoulder
an enormous burden with all consequences. Later, most of those who had to
investigate not only preferred to ignore the case as if nothing had happened,
but also some culprits had the time to conceal their participation into the
crime and evidences about. They also operated in the way of destroying our
reputation, charging us with false crimes. We remained exposed to enemy
attacks, we had to defense by
ourselves moving often from a town to another. On such condition it was just
impossible to find a normal work, often we made lowest and/or seasonal works
or black/moonlight work. This aspect joint with the economic crisis made the
situation became persistent. On such conditions, to survive, often we had to
ask aid to social services and to organizations which take care of needy.
Unfortunately defamation entered also in such organizations and we had no
longer aid from such sources. Social services and other
organizations didn’t take the courage or the sense of duty to assist us. Or
it also happened that authorities like municipality’s social services
considered us like a whatever person into indigent situation: they used
normal procedures to collect data that exposed us and our life to the enemy
persecution. It went worse than before: visible, localized, and unaided. Many times authorities, social
services and other organizations took care of us in wrong mode, opening the
way to our persecutors. In turn, they denigrate and mistreated us too becoming accomplices. Defamation and Isolation
Defamation As we told above, in origin defamation
and gossip were the methods used by the potent businessman to destroy the
company reputation, in achieving his goal to seize illegally company’s
patents and products. He defamed us
in the direction to block our hiring into other firms, so company’s products
and technicians who had projected them will have been at his complete
disposal. The defamation about our persons was done with every means: it was
spread into our municipality, among neighbors, into local police forces. Once the engine of the defamation
machine started, the phenomenon grew up by itself involving all what it
encountered on its way. Defamation machine seemed a tornado with all its
devastation power. In an earlier period the
persecution was carried out by businessman’s circle. The only thing to do and
to survive was to leave homeland, and almost for an initial period things
began really to run good away, but every time defamation reached the new
place, the only solution was to move again in a new area. In this “post” period the defamation
began to move by itself, without an igniter’s direct action, due to some
aspects: above all bureaucracy and January verdict errors. The movement between one town to another prevented we
got a new independent life, therefore our condition needed more than one time
social services assistance. Unfortunately social services asking information about
us to homeland: they also conveyed
into new land defamation too!
Plus the contacts with homeland made known to enemy our localization
with all consequences, and invariably persecution started again. For two years between 2006 and 2008 we
obtained assistance only from social services provided by Roman Catholic
Church, a very powerful network into Italy! But it happened that defamation
entered also into Church’s organizations. The exponentially increment of
defamation was due to the role played by police forces. Police forces were
strictly in symbiosis with every social services, with mayors, with Church’s
organizations and all other authorities… Normally police forces establish
order and security, but in our case they implanted defamation everywhere and
it was just more than a persecution! Whenever one goes in order to ask
aid, those who manages services, above all, and mainly before any
intervention, investigate about the demander. Investigation collects data
from other social services network
connected, from municipalities where one has lived before, and in particular
data are collected from police forces. Normally the data are collected for
public security but it happened that police forces became a natural
watercourse of defamations and a channel through which it was
broadcasted the false truth stated by the January verdict errors. Those members of police forces,
who were involved into the interception of our report at Court, had all the
reason to destroy us and every evidence. They became our first enemy and the
first persons who operated against us,
in order to destroy our public image and preventing any attempt to get
a new life. They concealed the truth and they deliberately put defamation
into the machine of justice and tampered with our documents. The enemy’s plan to create into police forces the
sensation that our assertions were an attack to police had success! Police
made war against us instead against the true culprits! Defamation covered the
true culprits. A parallel situation occurred into structures for poor people.
Isolation The isolation was a consequence of a
defamation, indeed a lot of false
stories was narrated deliberately to isolate us from anyone rescuer. Some
defamation described us as war-mongers. This created the false appearance
that our protests were only an attack
with the natural consequences. This
happened various time whether into police forces whether into structures for
poor people. The defamation put into machine of justice
prevented us to meet prosecutor, for example, and into social services
prevented to us to have some services. More than one time we would like support from
citizens, from press and from media. Those who should have to inform citizen
about , did nothing. If we tried to do that by ourselves, nobody believed us!
|
|
|
|
